Updated February 23 at 8:14 p.m.
On Wednesday afternoon, unions representing teachers and educational support professionals in both Minneapolis and St. Paul filed notifications of their intent to strike. They announced a strike date of March 8 if they do not reach contract agreements with their districts.
The unions’ actions follow a resounding February 17 vote to authorize a strike in both cities after months of negotiation and mediation. Districts and educators are also confronting declining enrollment and the most stressful years in many teachers’ careers.
At a Wednesday afternoon news conference outside the Bureau of Mediation Services office in St. Paul, educators stressed that they preferred not to strike, and would continue to work toward a contract agreement. But their strike notification sent a clear warning that they are willing to strike if they do not reach a satisfactory deal around mental health support, class sizes, staffing, and wage increases.
Ma-Riah Roberson-Moody, who works as a special education assistant at Minneapolis’ Roosevelt High School, spoke on behalf of education support professionals, or ESPs. A wage increase for education support professionals is one of the Minneapolis Federation of Teachers’ main demands. The union is calling for an increase in these educators’ starting annual wages from $24,000 to $35,000.
“ESPs cannot make the wages that we make anymore,” Roberson-Moody said. “We cannot keep going on with the way things are. We cannot accept the status quo.”
“It’s not going to get any better if we do nothing,” said Greta Callahan, the teacher chapter president of the Minneapolis Federation of Teachers. “The alternative is for our students to continue to not receive the things that they deserve, and for enrollment to drop. We are offering systemic change.”
Minneapolis and St. Paul superintendents both released videos in response to the notification of intent to strike, saying they share many priorities with the unions but that the educators’ proposals are too costly.
Collectively, the unions represent more than 8,000 educators. If they strike, classes could be canceled for more than 60,000 students.
For St. Paul families, the pending strike may feel like deja vu. Educators went on strike for three days in March 2020, just before the pandemic shuttered school buildings. Minneapolis educators have not gone on strike since 1970.
So how did we get here? What do educators want? What do the superintendents have to say about it? And what does this mean for your family? We’ve got the answers.
Wait. What does “intent to strike” mean? Are teachers going on strike?
It’s heading in that direction, but it’s still not certain. Contract negotiations will continue, and unions can call off a strike at any point if they reach a deal with management. But if they don’t come to a tentative agreement, educators in both cities plan to strike as soon as March 8.
The law requires a minimum 10-day cooling-off period between filing a notice of intent to strike and an actual strike.
Educators in both Minneapolis and St. Paul voted decisively to authorize the strike. The unions announced the results of their strike votes on February 17. In St. Paul, about two-thirds of educators came to the Iron Workers Union Hall to cast their ballots; 78 percent voted to authorize a strike.
In Minneapolis, the strike vote was nearly unanimous among both teachers and education support professionals. Educators voted inside their school buildings, boosting turnout: 93 percent of education support professionals voted, with 98 percent voting to authorize a strike if necessary; 96 percent of teachers voted, with 97 percent voting yes.
What happens if educators strike? Will my kids have school?
No. Classes would be canceled, and the instructional time would have to be made up later.
OK, back up. Why would educators go on strike?
For many teachers, this has been the most stressful year of their careers. Support staff such as substitute teachers and bus drivers are in short supply. Students’ academic and mental health needs are higher than ever, as they attempt to rebound from a long period of distance learning and isolation. Teachers have to help provide coursework to students who are quarantining with COVID-19 and spend their prep hours covering for absent colleagues.
“I think MPS has not been paying attention to the fact that we need to do things differently if we want to retain and serve the families that stay here well and also attract other families,” said Daniel Perez, a social worker at Green Central Elementary School in Minneapolis. Families and teachers need more mental health support and smaller class sizes, he said. While Green Central is better staffed than some schools, Perez said, with his caseload he is still “hanging by a thread.”
A survey released February 15 from the University of Minnesota shows students, teachers, and administrators throughout the state all identifying student and staff mental health as a top challenge, even as they say they are receiving less mental health support than they used to. The survey, administered in October and November, shows mental health needs at their highest levels since the pandemic began.
Educators in both Minneapolis and St. Paul have identified social-emotional support for their students as a priority.
“If we don’t get counselors, where does this leave us as a profession?” asked Nafeesah Muhammad, an English teacher in the Community Connected Academy program at Minneapolis’ Patrick Henry High School. “It looks like most of the educators of color, whether they’re the ESP chapter or the teacher chapter, making up for that. Because we understand a lot of the stressors and the traumatic experiences that pertain to our students.”
While Minneapolis and St. Paul unions share many priorities, including mental health support, the dynamics are a bit different between the two districts.
What do St. Paul educators want?
You may recall that St. Paul educators last went on strike in March 2020, right before COVID-19 shut down in-person learning for students across the state. Before that, they narrowly averted a strike in 2018.
The 2020 strike lasted three days before the union and district reached a deal; educators returned to prepare for pandemic learning. Some teachers and union leaders believe they left the 2020 strike’s business unfinished, and that conditions have only gotten worse.
Among them is Diedra Carlson, who currently teaches second grade for St. Paul’s online elementary school. Carlson, a Montessori-trained teacher who has taught with the district since 2003, noted that many of the demands are similar to those in 2020: smaller class sizes, sustainable mental health support in every school, full-time nurses. Now, COVID has exacerbated the problems that existed before, she said.
“We need those services even more,” Carlson said. “In fact, they’re urgent now.”
In recent years, educators have struck deals with St. Paul Public Schools on class-size caps, mental health support in schools and restorative justice practices. But now, they say, the district wants to take some of those guarantees away. Educators want to strengthen them. St. Paul educators also want a 2.5 percent pay raise; the district has proposed 1.5 percent.
What about Minneapolis?
Minneapolis educators want more staff: more counselors, psychologists, social workers, and education support professionals. They also want better pay, smaller class sizes, more COVID protections, and better support and retention for teachers of color.
One of the union’s major demands is a wage increase for educational support professionals. According to the Minneapolis Federation of Teachers, some of these educators—who are on balance much more diverse than the predominantly white teacher workforce—make as little as $24,000 per year, and often work multiple jobs. The union is asking for a salary minimum of $35,000 per year for these professionals.
They also want a 20 percent pay increase for teachers.
A 20 percent pay raise? Walk me through the math here?
Since 2001, Minneapolis teachers have received no more than a 2 percent pay raise each year, according to union data. That totals a 42 percent pay increase since 2001. Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics show that in that same time period, the cost of living in the Twin Cities metro area has increased by 54 percent.
Teacher salaries vary based on experience and education. Yet data compiled by the Minnesota Professional Licensing and Educator Standards Board show that the average Minneapolis teacher earns $71,535 per year. The average teacher salary in St. Paul is $85,457.
“We’ve really kind of dropped the ball on what we would consider respectable compensation for what we do,” said Edward Barlow, who teaches music at Anwatin Middle School. “And that is something that is sorely apparent when you look at the disparity between our district and other districts around the state.”
According to data compiled by the union, based on the 2018-2019 pay schedule, Minneapolis teachers’ lifetime earnings are less than those of teachers in most neighboring districts. Minneapolis teachers’ cumulative earnings rank 15th out of 20 neighboring districts in a 20-year period, and 18th out of 20 in a 30-year period.
Put another way, over a 30-year teaching career, a Minneapolis teacher would earn $386,000 less than a teacher in Minnetonka; $218,000 less than a teacher in Bloomington; and $139,000 less than a teacher in St. Paul.
Minneapolis Public Schools have declined to comment on these numbers.
Educators hope that increasing pay will help retain educators, especially teachers of color.
“I knew I was always going to teach in a setting where I could make the most difference,” said Barlow, who has taught in Minneapolis for 32 years. ”But I also didn’t take an oath of poverty. And when you go through the process of perfecting your craft, you go to school, you get advanced degrees, you do all these things, and then you don’t see compensation helping you to even recoup the funds that you’ve invested in yourself, that gets really demoralizing.”
Low pay can lead educators to go elsewhere—including the teachers of color the district says it wants, Barlow said.
“If you’re going to try to retain the best and brightest, you need to offer attractive compensation,” he said.
What do the superintendents say about this?
In a pair of videos released February 23, both superintendents said they shared priorities with the unions, but that the union proposals were not feasible in a time of budget shortfalls and declining enrollment.
“Our educators deserve everything they are asking for in a new contract. They do,” said Joe Gothard, the superintendent of St. Paul Public Schools. “At the same time, we have fewer students, fewer resources, and less money to meet those needs.”
Over the past several years, the district added nearly 170 mental health support staff, and invested an additional $22.8 million in mental health staff and services with American Rescue Plan funding, Gothard said. But the union wants even more, he said, which the district can’t afford.
Gothard indicated that the district had offered to keep existing class size caps in place, which it had previously pushed to remove. He also said the district had offered $9 million in wage increases, even as it faces a $43 million shortfall.
“We simply cannot spend more and more on staff and higher salaries in our current environment,” he said. “Now is not the time to strike. Now is the time to come together and find ways to serve our students who have already lost so much, especially our students of color and the many St. Paul families who were disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.”
Ed Graff, the superintendent of Minneapolis Public Schools, said he’d directed staff to negotiate around the clock in order to reach an agreement before March 8 with intentions of avoiding a strike. He said the union and district shared many priorities: higher pay for education support professionals, more mental health support, more teachers from diverse backgrounds, and competitive teacher wages.
“It is my responsibility, however, and the responsibility of our Board of Education, to ensure that MPS is financially solvent when today’s kindergarteners graduate, and for years to come after that,” he said.
He pointed to declining enrollment, the state’s chronic underfunding of special education and English language learner services, and the increasing costs of operating schools as reasons for the district’s budget shortfall.
“No one wants a strike,” he said. “We will be working day and night to avoid that.”
I heard the Minneapolis teachers’ union and the district can’t agree on a contract provision to protect teachers of color.
Correct. Though to be clear, the union and the district can’t agree on a lot of things at the moment. Let’s break it down.
Both the Minneapolis Federation of Teachers and the Minneapolis Public Schools have said they want to change the layoff process to retain teachers of color.
Layoff processes traditionally are structured to prioritize tenured teachers with seniority; the most recently hired teachers are the first to be let go. Newer teachers tend to be more diverse than senior teachers, which means this process has a disproportionate impact on teachers of color. In one high-profile case, this practice meant elementary teacher Qorsho Hassan lost her position in Burnsville shortly before being named Minnesota Teacher of the Year.
Before negotiations went into mediation, MFT and MPS exchanged proposals on this issue. MFT suggested going out of seniority order for layoffs at certain racially isolated schools. The district asked the union to broaden the scope of the schools covered, and presented a counterproposal to extend the protection to all teachers who reside in Minneapolis. MFT found that proposal to be so broad as to be almost meaningless.
It’s worth noting that getting this contract language right in a way that’s legally binding can be tricky. In Qorsho’s case, the teachers union in Burnsville thought its contract protected teachers of color, but the school board determined that explicitly prioritizing certain racial groups in the hiring process could run afoul of the law and leave the district open to lawsuits.
The Advancing Equity Coalition, an advocacy group campaigning for this language change in Minneapolis, points to budget projections that show possible cuts of up to 134 Minneapolis teachers in the next school year. About 30 percent of probationary teachers are people of color, the coalition said, and could be more likely to lose their jobs in this process.
Cuts don’t necessarily mean layoffs, however. The district could reduce its number of teachers through retirements. And under statute, probationary teachers are effectively at-will employees—meaning, the district has full discretion over which probationary teachers to bring back next year.
Still, at a Minneapolis school board meeting Tuesday night, Graff warned that budget shortfalls and declining enrollment made conversations about layoffs and school closures “unavoidable.”
Are layoffs the only problem affecting retention of Minneapolis teachers of color?
No. Since the 2016–2017 school year, more than 2,300 teachers have left Minneapolis Public Schools for any reason, including retirements, firings, and voluntary departures. Of those, 489 have been teachers of color—more than 20 percent.
In this time, only one teacher was laid off, according to a Minneapolis Public Schools spokesperson. That individual was white.
“There seems to be a decided lack of interest in advocating to try to retain teachers of color in Minneapolis,” said Marcia Howard, an English teacher at Roosevelt High School. “If we get laid off, we’re the ones getting laid off. Another way we lose them is they’ll leave and go to a different district that’s going to pay more. Or they leave the classroom to become admin, because that pays more.”
That has consequences, Howard said.
“Our students suffer from it,” she said. ”And everyone knows that when you are from a marginalized community and you teach people from marginalized communities, the emotional labor is twice as much.”
What about COVID money from the federal government? And the state budget surplus?
At a February 11 news conference, Gothard said that the district is spending federal American Rescue Plan funding on many of St. Paul Federation of Educators’ priorities. That includes millions in mental health support, training on responding to trauma, recruitment and retention of teachers and staff of color, and support for multilingual learners. The process involved thousands of stakeholders, he said. He noted that the White House has identified St. Paul schools as a national example of how to spend the funding.
Yet, that funding needs to be spent by September 2024, he said. “If we use it to hire permanent staff or increase wages across the board, we will not be able to sustain those investments,” he said. “Using these federal funds to fill holes now will only create larger problems down the line.”
Minneapolis Public Schools took a different approach with its federal funds, opting to use much of the balance to plug budget holes and maintain existing staff. Some experts and school board members warned this approach could cause a fiscal cliff when the funding expires. The district also used federal funds for some mental health support and COVID safety measures.
“They have over 250 million federal dollars,” said Callahan. “They are choosing not to invest this in their students. This is a choice.”
In his February 23 video, Graff said that COVID-19 relief funds could help the district manage its budget shortfall, but only temporarily. “These one-time dollars cannot sustain long-term expenses like salaries and benefits for our staff,” he said. “MPS has to weigh the impact of a strike now against the impact to students and families in the future if we spend money we don’t have.”
Callahan and her counterpart in the St. Paul Federation of Educators, Leah VanDassor, also pointed out that the state currently has a $7.7 billion surplus, some of which could be used to fund education. So far, they said, they have not heard from any legislators offering to help.